Skip Navigation

Dvorak vs Qwerty

If I might start by begging your indulgence - please look down at your keyboard. It's not very interesting, I know, but this won't take long. You see at the top left of the section containing letters a Q? Of course you do. To the right of that, you will more than likely spot W, E, R, T and Y. You might be surprised to learn that the reason you see those letters, and the others on your keyboard, in the position that they are in is because this makes your typing slower. That, and economics.

"Why", you may well ask, "would keyboards be designed to make typing slower?". A good question. Back when Christopher Sholes created the Qwerty layout in the 1800s, it solved a problem. Economics has kept it in place ever since.

The main problem Sholes faced was that of bars colliding during typing. If two keys near each other were pressed quickly in succession, the bars they controlled sometimes collided or jammed. In order to avoid this problem, Sholes re-arranged his keyboard so that common combinations of letters were hard to type, thus making the keyboard slower and reducing the chance of jamming.

The other reason for the placement of some of the Qwerty keys in certain places was to boost typewriter sales. In order for salesmen to be able to sell typewriters, it was important that they not be seen 'hunting and pecking' during demonstrations. R was moved for this reason, and replaced the period on the left of the T.

That is why, if you look once again at your keyboard, you will see that commonly typed pairs of letters are well spaced out, and that the word "typewriter" can be typed using just the letters on the top row.

Dusty typewriter.

Once the Qwerty layout was in place, it was simple economics that kept it there. Typists were trained to use it, which meant that makers of newer typewriters had to use the same layout, otherwise potential customers would need to re-train staff. The same has applied ever since - people make Qwerty keyboards because that is what people are trained to use, not because it is the best layout.

The Qwerty layout

The Qwerty layout

The Dvorak layout

The Dvorak layout

Dvorak is an alternative to Qwerty. It is a keyboard layout designed to minimise movement, and make typing as easy and painless as possible. The idea behind it is to have the most commonly typed keys under the fingers, and make it as easy as possible to type common words and combinations of letters. To give an impressions of just how big a difference this makes, consider that the average Dvorak typist's fingers will travel about one mile in a day of typing. A Qwerty typist's will travel anything from 16 to 20 miles. Try to consider, for a moment, the effect that must have on your fingers.

Dvorak is easy to pick up, taking about half as long as Qwerty. That is little comfort to those who are already familiar with Qwerty, as it means starting over. However, the benefits certainly make it worth spending a couple of weeks learning to type all over again. For many of us, that is actually a benefit, since many computer users never learned to type properly in the first place.

Changing your PC over to Dvorak is actually quite easy. In your Control Panel, in the Keyboard settings, you will see a tab for "Input Locales". If you want to use Dvorak, simply select a Dvorak layout from the drop down on this screen (please note - you may have to re-start running applications for the change to take effect within them).

Changing the keys themselves is actually the trickiest bit of the process. You have a few options though. Before you try and change your keys though, I recommend you learn to use the keyboard. If you wait before changing your keys over, you will avoid hunting and pecking, and your typing will be all the better for it. If you do want to change them, you can use stickers (probably the quickest technique), and some keyboards make it very easy to move keys around. There are also suppliers who offer specific Dvorak keyboards, though these are rare.

Take another look at your keyboard. Are you really happy using something that intentionally slows you down? Something that makes you move your hands and wrists far more than is necessary? Would you not rather use something that was designed to make your life easier?

Update, 4th April 2007: Josue Salazar changed his Macbook to Dvorak - in part, he says, because of this article. Check out the photoset: Dvorak Black Macbook Photo Set.

34 comments

Right on, man! I'm liked your article: short, but not too short. I'm disappointed that Dvorak has gotten such a bad rap, especially since that mangled "research" report in Reason. I think we'd all be better off if we all switched to the Dvorak layout.

I was scared to change at first since I have to often use different keyboards at different PCs. But I talked to a friend who forced himself to use the Dvorak layout whenever possible. To his surprise, he has no problem switching between the two layouts. He's faster at Dvorak, but he's just about as fast as he used to be with a Qwerty keyboard. Learning Dvorak doesn't nullify most people's QWERTY skills. :-)
Yes, the so-called research reports have done it no favours! And I agree, we'd all be better off with a better layout. Can't see a massive switch happening any time soon though ...
Electrode
United Kingdom #3: October 30, 2004
Dvorak is a brillant layout. OK, so although being a fairly accomplished QWERTY typist made learning Dvorak pretty difficult for me at first (I kept on switching because I just couldn't stand how slow I was), I've managed to get myself up to a decent-enough speed on Dvorak (within a month of starting out) that I don't have to keep switching any more. Not to mention the fact that my right wrist got uncomfortable after an hour's worth of typing on QWERTY - this doesn't happen (or at least, the effect is greatly diminished) if I use Dvorak.
You didn't point out the interesting "security" side effect of typing Dvorak on a standard keyboard: no one who views your keypresses has any clue what you're typing! I've never bothered with the stickers or with switching the keycaps, but because of this I've also had to memorize the common Ctrl+ and Alt+ shortcuts by how they actually turn out relative to how the keys are labelled (because shortcuts involve moving one's hands from the standard typing position). For example, te send a message in Pine I type "Ctrl+B,T" or to bold text I type "Ctrl+N" or italic is "Ctrl+G" and so on. Having done it this way, it's easy to use any public computer where I'm allowed to switch the virtual layout in Control Panel, but obviously can't change the physical keyboard itself.

Thanks for the clear and concise article.
Dvorak Fan
United States #5: April 19, 2005
I'm a Dvorak convert since about 2000. It has worked out very well. I feel myself typing with less strain. Now, I'm trying to relearn QWERTY to pass the typing certificates. It sucks because my arms and fingers get tired really fast. And trying to remember both formats is hard.
Antoine
Russian Federation #6: May 19, 2005
I've been typing on a Dvorak layout for a couple of years, and the biggest problem is with keyboard shortcuts, since these are designed for QWERTY typers.

For example, the standard cut/copy/paste, Ctrl+X/C/V, becomes much harder to type on a Dvorak layout because these keys are not adjacent anymore. Copy becomes Ctrl+I, which also is hard to type single-handedly.

I read there's an option in MacOS X to change the layout back to QWERTY whenever a key modifier is pressed, so that shortcuts remain essentially unchanged, but I haven't been able to figure out anything similar for Windows or Linux.
Hase
United States #7: June 14, 2005
Good article but you fall to the same myth that most do. The Qwerty arrangement was not established to "slow people down." It slows down those who are learning but even 100 years ago, I think that typewriter manufacturers anticipated touch-typing and an elimination of confusion. As a matter of fact, I'll bet they were banking on the ability of the users to overcome the confusion. The keys were arrange in that fashion so that the commonly paired "typebars" would be less likely to collide. See: http://home.earthlink.net/~dcrehr/whyqwert.html
Hi Hase - I did explain that the reason was that two keys close together when pressed quickly can collide, and thus common pairs were spread out. The effect was to slow people down and make typing more difficult, but you are right, the actual intention was not to slow people down, just to prevent collisions.
Toobad
Finland #9: July 15, 2005
It's too bad that DVORAK doesen't have the scandinavian letters ä, ö, and å.. i would switch right away but those things are missing.. too bad :/
Toobad
Finland #10: July 15, 2005
And also i dont think the DVORAK layout really fits different language's than english.
Xiphoid
Netherlands #11: July 21, 2005
Toobad>> That's why there are different types of Dvorak Layouts. I wanna give you a link, but I just see that answers.com gives truely terrible long links... anyway, for the long cut-n-paste action, here comes it anyway:

http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery;jsessionid=2vkrv3hu5hqtr?method=4&dsid=2222&dekey=Dvorak+Simplified+Keyboard&gwp=8&curtab=2222_1&sbid=lc03a&linktext=Dvorak%20Simplified%20Keyboard

that's the link :D
tolos
United States #12: August 1, 2005
hey, i just wanted to point out that you can still usually use the old copy/paste shortcuts:

CTRL+INS: copy
SHIFT+INS: paste
SHIFT+DEL: cut
Jeff
United Kingdom #13: September 19, 2005
I notice my WIN98SE does not have this "input locales" option, although I can change to other languages.
Any suggestions for trying Dvorak with WIN98SE?
Will Dowd
United States #14: November 1, 2005
I bought a programmable keypad to make copy-n-pasting easier, as well as to improve functionality in other areas.

http://www.x-keys.com/xkeys.php
Have you ever wondered why the rows of keys - 1-Q-A-Z, 2-W-S-X, etc, are slanted sideways and not vertically aligned?

I'm convinced that it's an artifact of the original design, just like the QWERTY layout. But no one realizes it and no one cares to fix it - even though apapting to the corrected key placement is a lot easier than switching to a totally new layout.
Aaron
United States #16: December 21, 2005
I think you missed two points that convinced me to switch.

1. 250 characters/minute (50 WPM) * 60 minutes/hours * 40 hours/week * 50 weeks/year = 30,000,000 characters/year. Even if you don't type full speed at work your number of keystrokes is measured in millions of strokes a year! Even the smallest benefit per keystroke will be large over the course of a lifetime of typing.

2. Everyone I know of was able to touch type QWERTY first. I have not heard of anyone who touts Dvorak without knowing how green the grass is in the QWERTY camp.
Jeffrey Wilcke
Netherlands #17: January 6, 2006
I've been using DVORAK for quite ome time now. I have to admit it's so much nicer. I type so much faster and it's defenately the programmars layout! Now all the special key like .,'?+_{} are no longer all alignt on the right side which improves our speed signivecantly.

I recommand the DVORAK layout for every coder out there. And for the Swedish people SVORAK (The Swedish variant on DVORAK).

Dr. Dvorak, you're a genious! ^^
Think about this for a second. Your left index rests on 'u', and has to move sideways to type 'i'. But 'i' is three times more common than 'u'. So the keys 'u' and 'i' should be switched.

The same happens with the pairs p and y, and g and f (thought the difference in frequency is small, these pairs should be switched too).

Anton Gavrilov, the slant has been bothering me ever since I started touch-typing. It's great for the right hand, but for the left hand it's awful. Luckily there are keyboards that align the keys vertically and you can buy one of those.
Aimee
United Kingdom #19: January 16, 2006
Just found this, and wanted to add, I've been using a TypeMatrix 2030 Dvorak keyboard for a few months now at work, and it's so much better with the keys aligned in columns. It also has shortcut cut/copy/paste keys under your left hand, and lovely back-space and enter keys in the middle where you can get at them more easily.

Hugely recommended!!

http://www.typematrix.com/ezr2030/dvorak.html (or search on ebay).
Aimee
United Kingdom #20: January 16, 2006
And what's more ... it gets people at work interested in Dvorak! They all freak out when they try to type on my keyboard, I have to have a standard Qwerty plugged in aswell, for visitors! heh!
I was a relatively fast QWERTY typist, without touch-typing.. I could type about 50wpm without relying on the homerow, or looking at the keyboard TOO much, with rather poor accuracy though.

About a year ago (Nov. 2004) I decided to learn touch typing, and that's when I discovered Dvorak! So, I decided that if I'm going to 'learn to type anew' anyway, I might as well do it with a more efficient keyboard layout. Of course nothing could be further from the truth, since the QWERTY keyboard turned out to be quite ingrained in my head! The learning process was slow, but with a typing tutor and about 3 weeks, I managed to learn to type by touch, using Dvorak, and with decent speeds.

Today, I type about 60-70 wpm with VERY good accuracy (or 70-85 with subpar accuracy ;p), totally blindly! Yay!

My QWERTY ability is exactly as it was before, and so it's no great trouble for me (especially as my workplace, school, university, and the public library are Dvorak-friendly)

I did NOT rearrange my keys (they are still in QWERTY layout) for a rather simple reason: I too am married to the keyboard shortcuts, particularly the Ctrl-A,S,Z,X,C,V variety, and also the Winkey-R,E,L bunch and global winamp shortcuts (Winkey-Z,X,C,V,B,N). To preserve those, I use AutoHotkey, a great piece of freeware which helps me keep all those things intact :) I actually use two scripts 'shortcuts' at home, to make the shortcuts work, and 'dvorak', for public terminals that don't let me change the layout. Dvorak.exe has the nice property that it only remaps regular letters, not ctrl-, alt-, etc. combinations, so the net effect is that I get the same keyboard behaviour everywhere!. So, to type things like Ctrl-Y, I actually look at the keyboard and follow the QWERTY stickers :D

If you're interested, I can provide you with the .ahk scripts or the compiled .exes that I use. :-)

P.S.
Not rearranging your keys also helps you learn the layout! If your computer sees shared use/frequent visitors, and you're _already_ perfectly fluent in Dvorak, only then do I suggest rearranging the keycaps as a courtesy to your visitors. (For this task, I suggest a keyboard with a curved backplate, where every keys has the same shape, notably the IBM Model M -- which has also has additional design features to make this modification a breeze!).

Then you can even visit Hooleon (or a similar internet shop) and grab a label kit so you can have little red (or whatever) QWERTY letters in the bottom right corner of all the keys, to help you with your Ctrl-Shift-Hs. Don't forget to get the 'home row' nubs to stick onto your I and D keys ;p
Hi there. I have a small quibble with your article...

Having common digraphs on the opposite side of the keyboard doesn't necessarily slow down the typist; a typist, anticipating, can position one hand while he types with the other. In fact, the Dvorak layout doesn't much use keys next to each other (except, of course, the 'th' digraph.) It's designed to alternate hands even more than the Qwerty system.

The real strength in Dvorak over Qwerty is that Dvorak puts most of the most-common letters in the home row, rather than spread out over the keyboard.

Good article, though!
Brad
United States #23: May 4, 2006
I switched because I thought I had carpal tunnel. It turns out I had something unrelated and very weird, but I'm glad I converted.

For key caps, I just use these: http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/dvorcaps.pdf
Print on label stock, cover with clear strong tape, cut out and stick em on. The QWERTY letters are in small font on each key if you need them.

If I'm on a machine other than my own that has Internet access, I use the dvorak converter:
http://wbic16.xedoloh.com/dvorak.html

I don't mess with QWERTY ever (I just don't know if I could handle both).

If I'm at a public library or whatever, I just hunt and peck - not very often at all.

The settings for WinXP are in "language and regional options". You have to add Dvorak in as a language and remove English unless you want every application that launches to default back to QWERTY.

I've added Dvorak in (but kept English as default so I can manually switch when I'm using it) on relative's computers, but more that once a relative has called me wondering why they are seeing all the wrong characters appear on their screen.

I plan to teach my kids Dvorak - I hope the movement grows!
Russell
United States #24: May 7, 2006
I've known about Dvorak for over twenty years, but never bothered to learn it until I started showing signs of RSI. After using it for a couple of months, my wrists healed up and stayed that way for a couple of YEARS! Then I got stupid-lazy (wife complained) and started using Qwerty again. The RSI is back, now.

I'm setting up a small CNC shop soon, and I'm filling it with Linux, Open-source software, and Dvorak keyboards!
witchdoctor
United States #25: September 10, 2006
Been using Dvorak since I was 16. Converted the girlfriend over to it with no effort on my part. Fixed our RSI.
dvorak lover in UK not in USA
United States #26: October 1, 2006
I just started dvorak last month and it is a lot easier on the fingers!
thespianchef
United Kingdom #27: October 19, 2006
Stas in canada - could you please send me your ahk scripts for cut and paste etc? You can send them to me at thespianchef@yahoo.co.uk Would be very much appreciated :-) I haven't got a clue how to programme them myself!

Thanks

Thesp
Stas, I'd appreciate your ahk scripts, too.
zquake at a domain named gmail com
Thanks!

Aimee: Yeah, I've been thinking about a TypeMatrix. I like the design, but I'm unsure about the keys, they look so flat. I'd hate to type on a keyboard that feels like those on laptops, with reduced key travel. Can you please clarify what the keys an a TypeMatrix feel like?
Marv, US
United States #29: December 9, 2006
Very informative blog. It should be quite obvious to anyone who views the facts to see the evils of QWERTY.

I used Dvoark for about 10 months before I had problems with it. I experienced some strain on my right pinky.

I wholeheartedly agree that QWERTY is evil and should be abolished, but that's another story. Honestly, I do not believe Dvorak to be a viable alternative for QWERTY. I believe people who're just starting out and learning how touch-type should consider using Dvorak. However, for advance touch-typers using QWERTY, and even people who're just learning how to touch-type, I would suggest checking out the Colemak layout (http://colemak.com). It doesn't change as many keys as Dvorak, and it retains a lot of keys in their QWERTY positions (e.g. Ctrl-Z/C/V/B).

At any rate, any keyboard that's better than QWERTY should be considered.
bob
United States #30: October 8, 2007
i like the qwerty keyboard
Hum.... I might try this DVORAK thing, and I may show this article to my mother. She's got Rhumetoid Arthritis and it's very difficult for her to type, maybe this will be better for the both of us.
Chinese learner
Canada #32: November 27, 2007
Anybody knows how to type Chinese using Pinyin on standard IME with Dvorak?
On the whole Dvorak is more rational than QWERTY, but some of Dvorak's characteristics are puzzling. Does anyone know why the Dvorak puts the most frequently used keys on one side, moreover, the left side? QWERTY actually does a better job of balancing hand use.
I started learning Dvorak for a couple of months but was not really feeling the love for it over Qwerty in a lot of ways. Found it rather strange and somethings didn't make sense to me. Fortunately, I discovered Colemak (colemak.com) and l loved the layout and quickly learned it and have not looked back since!

Post Your Comment

· Comments with keywords instead of a name have their URLs removed.
· Your email address will not be displayed or shared.

Live Comment Preview

 United States #35: 1 minute ago